Archive
Mid-week with Lou: Falkenstein, Pesquera, Ponsot, Tribouley, and more
Mid-week tastings with Lou tend to feature wines that do not normally fit into a tasting theme. Darryl has turned my attention to Falkenstein so I could not resist trying the young but very good 2018 Hofgut Falkenstein, Niedermenniger Herrenberg Riesling Spätlese feinherb AP11, Mosel. We then changed gears with the mature 2001 François Pinon, Cuvée 2001, Vouvray. The luxurious body of the wine surprised me. The feral smelling 2008 Jean-Louis Tribouley, Vieilles Vignes, Les Bacs, VdP Cotes Catalanes has completely clean strawberry and cranberry flavors in the mouth. It is actually still young and worth tracking over the next several years.
I had high hope for the 1994 Bodegas Alejandro Fernandez, Tinto Pesquera, Ribera del Duero. This bottle came from a great DC cellar which offered up beautiful bottles of first growth Bordeaux back to the 1950s and a wide range of top-notch Burgundy. This bottle of Pesquera was quite good, evocative of Ribera del Duero, but the finish is a little short. I formed the impression it might not be the best example. I have a second bottle so I will report back this winter.
Not quite satisfied, I opened up 1983 Domaine Ponsot, Clos de la Roche which also came from the same DC cellar. I was told it was acquired upon release. Served out of a decanter, this was a great bottle in great shape which continued to develop until none was left. Lou and I just sat at the peninsula, chatting and drinking, completely satisfied, thrilled at how great mature Burgundy can be. This is my first experience with Ponsot and I cannot wait for another!
2018 Hofgut Falkenstein, Niedermenniger Herrenberg Riesling Spätlese feinherb AP11, Mosel – $27
A Lars Carlberg Selection imported by Williams Corner Wine. Alcohol 10%. A pretty, floral nose. Good body with gentle, lifted acidity and racy flavor. It is a lively wine integrating sweet lemon flavors, chalky texture, and acidity. Good presence. **** Now – 2029.
2001 François Pinon, Cuvée 2001, Vouvray
Imported by Louis/Dressner Selections. Alcohol 12.2%. A light yellow straw. Chenin-like for sure, fresh and round with a woodsy/orchard note. In good shape it develops both flesh and fat with a little tartness to keep it alive. ***(*) Now – 2025.
2008 Jean-Louis Tribouley, Vieilles Vignes, Les Bacs, VdP Cotes Catalanes
Imported by Weygandt-Metzler. Alcohol 14.5%. A little stinky but ultimately, ferale smelling. Rounded and ripe in the mouth with a fine vein of black fruit. It develops strawberry confit flavors in the glass with spicy structure and a red cranberry finish. Quite youthful in the mouth with a good dose of structure. ***(*) Now – 2025.
1994 Bodegas Alejandro Fernandez, Tinto Pesquera, Ribera del Duero
Imported by Classical Wines From Spain. Alcohol 13%. Advanced in color. A deep nose which is robust with dark, lovely, maturing aromas. It takes time to open up, eventually offering tart red fruit over an ethereal, dark soil foundation. It fleshes out in the mouth but the finish stays shorter than I would hope for. ***(*) Now – 2025.
1983 Domaine Ponsot, Clos de la Roche
Shipped by Robert Haas Selections and imported by Vineyard Brands. Upon the first pour, this is a fresh, ripe, mouth-filling wine that is round and full of soil notes. It is substantial in personality and flavor, offering sweet orange and red fruits, minerals, soil, and a long-lasting finish. With air it shows chewy pungency and concentration. The mature mixture of sous-bois adds to the balance of flavor, supported by good acidity and structure. There is a tangy persistence to the aftertaste. This will continue to develop for some time. ****(*) Now – 2035.
A Clos du Mont-Olivet Vertical: 2017 Cotes du Rhone back to 2005 La Cuvee du Papet
I was a guest at the most recent blind tasting held by Phil’s tasting group. Of the eight wines we tasted blind, one was a stinker, so we were left with seven bottles to deduce the theme. Two of the wines, #5 and #8, were clearly Chateauneuf du Pape but the firmness of the younger vintages and stylistic difference of the ringer through me for a loop. I will fess up that I had recently drunk wine #2 but I was still stumped. In retrospect, the theme of Clos du Mont-Olivet can be appreciated.
The Sabon family have been making wine at Clos du Mont-Olivet since 1932 with the estate now run by Thierry Sabon. The tasting featured one vintage of Cotes du Rhone Vieilles Vignes, one vintage of Châteaneuf du Pape, and five vintages of Châteauneuf du Pape La Cuvee du Papet. The Cotes du Rhone Vieilles Vignes we tried is a typical blend of 80% Grenache, 10% Syrah, and 10% Carignan mostly sourced from vineyards planted in 1950. The fruit is partially destemmed then fermented with indigenous yeasts in cement tanks followed by aging in used foudre, demi-muids, and tanks. The Châteaneuf du Pape is a typical blend of 80% Grenache with Syrah, Mourvedre, and Cinsault rounding things out. The fruit is partially destemmed then fermented with indigenous yeasts in cement tanks. It is aged in in foudre. The top wine of the estate is La Cuvee du Papet which is only made in the best vintages. It is a typical blend of 75% Grenache, 15% Mourvedre, and 10% Syrah sources from multiple parcels. The vines range in age from 30 to 100+ years of age since the oldest parcel of Grenache was planted in 1901. The fruit is partially destemmed then fermented with indigenous yeasts in cement tanks followed by aging in used foudre and demi-muids.
The 2017 Clos du Mont-Olivet, Vieilles Vignes, Cotes du Rhone is an excellent follow-on to the 2016 vintage. It is, however, a wine which needs time to develop and should drink well for a few years. The best wine to drink now and one of my favorites of the tasting is the awesome 2005 Clos du Mont-Olivet, La Cuvee du Papet, Châteauneuf du Pape. Even better is the 2010 Clos du Mont-Olivet, La Cuvee du Papet, Châteauneuf du Pape. This superlative pair offers a wine that has just hit its mature phase, the 2005, and a wine shedding its youth, the 2010. I went back to these bottles multiple times simply to drink them. I recommend you buy some so you can as well! Worth cellaring, is the very young yet outstanding 2016 Clos du Mont-Olivet, La Cuvee du Papet, Châteauneuf du Pape. It has all the components for developing but is still firm. I’d give it several years of age at which point it should be obvious if it is as great as the 2010. Many thanks to Phil for hosting such an excellent tasting.
Blind #1 – 2017 Clos du Mont-Olivet, Vieilles Vignes, Cotes du Rhone –
Imported by Dionysos Imports. Alcohol 14.5%. Grapey scents on the nose. A young wine in the mouth with flavors of black and purple fruit with fine, dry and bitter structure in the end. With air it rounds and balances out. The ripe fruit has a touch of sweetness from a vanilla component. The flavors of blueberries and violets is carried by watering acidity. This is a mid-term ager that should significantly improve over the winter. *** Now – 2027.
Blind #2 – 2016 Clos du Mont-Olivet, Châteauneuf du Pape –
Imported by Dionysos Imports. Alcohol 15%. A good nose of red fruits. In this mouth this is a big wine with a spine of acidity. With air it opens up a touch offering creamy flavors of violets, black fruit, and a little wood box. With good depth it becomes firm in the end as a spicy structure comes out. It should be cellared. This bottle is tighter than a previous bottle I tried. ***(*) 2023- 2034.
Blind #3 – 2016 Clos du Mont-Olivet, La Cuvee du Papet, Châteauneuf du Pape –
Imported by Dionysos Imports. Alcohol 15%. An aromatic nose of blue fruits. In the mouth this is a big wine with fine, strong tannins, and a powerful wave of flavor through the finish. Like the regular CdP, this is closely packed and in need of age. With air the wine has all of the components clearly focused for development. It is savory, intense, and even a little spicy. ****(*) 2024- 2039.
Blind #4 – 2015 Clos du Mont-Olivet, La Cuvee du Papet, Châteauneuf du Pape –
Imported by Dionysos Imports. Alcohol 15%. A deeper, meaty nose. A watering start then the wine falls flat, compared to other vintages, offering vintage perfume notes, wood box, and baking spice. There are ample, fine and dry tannins. With air it improves to be lush yet not voluptuous with a deep, dry finish. The structure remains prominent compared to the fruit weight. A good wine in all respects but clearly overshadowed by the 2016. For the mid-term. ***(*) Now – 2029.
Blind #5 – 2010 Clos du Mont-Olivet, La Cuvee du Papet, Châteauneuf du Pape –
Imported by Dionysos Imports. Alcohol 15%. Saline and dense, this wine packs in tons of flavors right through the powerful end. though powerful, it keeps focused with creamy bits, luxurious fat, and wood box maturity. It is still so young but is clearly a great wine. Unlike the outstanding 2005, this has the intensity of youth which hits the throat with a dose of fruity raspberries. ***** Now – 2034.
Blind #6 – 2010 Domaine du Vieux Telegraphe, Châteauneuf du Pape –
Imported by Kermit Lynch. Polished on the nose. In the mouth it is a little saline, dry and tart with red, citric fruit. It has fine focus for the long-haul with polished wood tannins. With air there is a subtle, lifted hint of fat, wood box, and a killer finish. This wine will be slow to develop. **** 2023-2039.
Blind #7 – 2006 Clos du Mont-Olivet, La Cuvee du Papet, Châteauneuf du Pape –
Imported by Dionysos Imports. Alcohol 14%. A stinker, smells like air make it through the cork. Can’t stand it. Not Rated.
Blind #8 – 2005 Clos du Mont-Olivet, La Cuvee du Papet, Châteauneuf du Pape –
Imported by Dionysos Imports. Alcohol 14%. Taking on some garnet in the glass. A good nose. The ripe fruit and fine wood box notes are clearly part of a more complex Southern Rhone wine. It lovely with young power that comes through. Fat and weighty flavors drape on the tongue with a sweet middle. This is a Chateauneuf du Pape with tons of future potential but you can enjoy it now became it has some bottle age flavor and concentrating ripeness. ****(*) Now – 2034.
An Additional Blind Wine – 1998 Domaine Bois De Boursane, Châteauneuf du Pape –
Alcohol 13.5%. Some umami mixing with red fruit and watering acidity into the salty, firm finish. There is good flavor for drinking right now. If you decant drink quickly. *** Now.
The 2018 Enclos, Tourmaline
After the Giacomo Conterno, Cascina Franca Barbera d’Alba tasting we were privileged to try an interesting sample from Bordeaux. I’ll admit it was quite a pivot from mature Barbera but sometimes you must forge on.
The 2018 Enclos, Tourmaline, Pomerol is a tiny cuvee of some 275 cases produced only in the best vintages from the smallest appellation in Bordeaux. The wine is made entirely of Merlot sourced from vines averaging 25 years of age located on four tiny parcels which total 1 hectare. One plot is next to Clinet, one next to La Fleur Petrus, one between Le Pin and Trotanoy, and one next to Rouget. The fruit is fermented in 100% new oak then will be aged for an expected 20 months. This is full-bore, mineral Merlot which I found hard to believe it is a sample! It would be interesting to taste it again with other young Bordeaux to better put it in perspective.
2018 Enclos, Tourmaline, Pomerol echantillon
This wine is 100% Merlot which was whole berry fermented in 100% new oak. Alcohol 14.7%. This is serious, youthfully packed Merlot. It is young and big yet there is balance all around. Of moderate weight and fresh acidity it grips the gums. The tannins are very fine, fully integrated, and one harmonious part. Darker red and black fruits, very mineral, and almost plush in nature. **** from 2020.
Impressive Lirac from Mordoree
The 2016 Domaine de la Mordoree, La Dame Rousses, Lirac is a good wine from Lirac, a bit strong with some of the appellation’s hardness. However, Jenn and I soon moved on to and stayed with the 2016 Domaine de la Mordoree, Reine des Bois, Lirac. I do not think I have previously tasted a Lirac this good. The amount of flavor, depth, and balance are more akin to Chateauneuf du Pape. You certainly will not confuse it for CdP but this wine is contemporary Lirac at a new level of quality. I bought my two bottles at MacArthur Beverages.
2016 Domaine de la Mordoree, La Dame Rousses, Lirac – $22
Imported by Kysela Pere et Fils. This wine is a blend of 50% Grenache and 50% Syrah. Alcohol 14.5%. The good, dense ripe fruit of blue and black fruit has an intense edge. There is strength in this wine through the baking spiced and structured finish. It is best drunk in one go. *** Now – 2024.
2016 Domaine de la Mordoree, Reine des Bois, Lirac – $40
Imported by Kysela Pere et Fils. This wine is a blend of 40% Syrah, 30 Grenache, and 30% Mourvedre. This has slow building depth with a plummy middle and finish of dark, concentrated berries. It is not intense like La Dame Rousses, rather it offers ample, balanced floral and creamy flavors. The tannins are ripe and impeccably integrated providing unintrusive support. An impressive wine from Lirac. ****(*) Now – 2029.
A tasting of Château Léoville Poyferré 2015-1990
On January 18, 2019, Panos Kakaviatos (https://wine-chronicles.com/) gathered together a group of DC wine lovers for one of his biannual Bordeaux dinners. This was one was at Le Petit Bouchon Restaurant in the French Embassy and featured the wines of Léoville Poyferré.
As in the past he invited a guest from the Chateaux and had a vertical representation of multiple vintages. Also, as always, Panos was a wonderful host who obviously took great care in the menu and the wines to make sure everything showed at its best, and that the guests all had a great time. From the Chateau was Sara Lecompte-Cuvelier, who provided great commentary on the wines and was a charming ambassador for the estate.
The wines were served in five flights preceded by a variety of Champagne. For me the highlights were a 2002 Piper Heidsieck Rare and a 2002 Dom Perignon. Both were in a great place with bracing acidity, citrus fruit and a rich body. I give the edge to the Dom.
My general impressions of the wines were very positive, with a few very great ones. They all showed a nice structure that was never over the top. They were balanced and fresh, even in the riper vintages.
First Flight: 2014, 2012, 2010. Paired with Snails Croque Monsieur.
My favorite dish of the night and a smart pairing for these vintages.
2014 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
I liked this a lot and still think that 2014 Bordeaux overall may be the vintage to buy, given the balance of quality and price. This wine was very deep and rich, with cassis, cedar and a drying finish. Maybe a little austere in the middle. ***(*)
2012 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
My least favorite of the flight. Less polished, a little musty and earthy in the middle with some heat at the end. I do like the concentration and acidity. **(*)
2010 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
This is a very great wine. Very concentrated. Cassis, graphite, a spicy herbal note all balanced by some mineral and balanced acidity. Medium tannins and great structure. A terrific future. ****(*)
Second Flight: 2011, 2008, 2002. Paired with a lobster “purse” in a carrot ginger sauce.
While this was an unusual choice, I actually think it worked well.
2011 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
This reminded me of the 14 but a notch below in quality. Still very good. Tasting very young with hard tannin but great fruit and structure. I think it needs some time to come together a bit more. ***
2008 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
An expressive wine with hints of dried berry, lavender and mint on the nose. The fruit is there but more contained. I like it very much and can see this coming around sooner than some of the other wines. ***(*)
2002 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
The weakest of the flight. Leaner, with some green notes. Actually may be drinking at its peak now. Shows way better with the food. ** to *** ?
Third Flight: 2001, 2000, 1990. Lamb loin.
All these wines showed very well with the 1990 my favorite of the night.
2001 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
Some green herbaceousness, dill, some earth. Classically styled. ***
2000 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
A great nose with balanced notes of fruit, herbs and cassis. A long life ahead. ****
1990 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
Very fresh nose. Bright, rich. Creamy, silky fruit in the mouth. Perfect acidity and concentration.****(*)
Fourth Flight: 1989, 1985, 1982. Cheeses.
2006 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
A sharp, somewhat shrill nose is a deceptive start to what is actually a balanced wine. It likely just needs a bit of time to smooth the coarseness and fully integrate. ***
2005 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
A huge wine showing as very locked in at present. It is very rich and concentrated, very complex but desperately in need of time to show its best. ***(*)
2004 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
Showing better than I expected, this is a concentrated wine with strong notes of cedar and cassis. A pleasant surprise. ***
Fifth Flight: 2003, 2009, 2015. Chocolate Dessert.
An ok pairing. I remain skeptical about big red wines and chocolate.
2003 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
Very fond of this tonight. Not showing as roasted or overripe, except some coffee notes. Actually some green, minty notes present. Very fresh and complex. Another surprise. ****
2009 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
Still fairly primary. Black fruits, some wood and earth but smooth tannins. Needs lots of time. Impressive wine. ****(*)
2015 Château Léoville Poyferré, St. Julien
The greatest potential of all the wines tonight but now very primary with only the hints of what this will be. Very concentered blue fruits, vanilla, smoke and liqueur. I really like this. Is it better than the 1990? I’m not sure but can’t wait to see how it is after another couple of decades. The 2010 will certainly give it a run for its money. ****(*)
Thanks Panos for including me in a great event!
A Blind Janasse Vertical: 1999-2016
A few weeks ago I tasted through twelve wines blind. That they turned out to be all largely excellent was of no surprise for Roland was the host. The first two wines clearly (and with great comfort) pointed to the Southern Rhone with a level of complexity that indicated Chateauneuf du Pape. While a couple of people narrowed it down to a Janasse vertical by the third wine, I could not achieve such specificity by the final wine. I did, however, achieve confusion for amongst the chronological ordering, waves of similar and dissimilar wines kept me guessing. That we tasted a vertical of three cuvees, Tradition, Chaupin, and Vieilles Vignes from 1999 through 2016 made perfect sense in the end.
The Tradition is a blend of Grenache, Syrah, and Mourvedre fermented in tank then aged in foudre and a small proportion of new oak barrels. The Chaupin is pure Grenache sourced from 100+ year old vines. It is fermented in tank then aged in foudre and various sized barrels. The Vieilles Vignes is a blend of Grenache, Mourvedre, Syrah, and other varieties sourced from 60-110+ year old vines. It is fermented in tank then aged for 18 months in different sized barrels.
I thought the eldest vintages were 1998 and 2000 but to find them as 1999 and 2003 is a good experience. There has been a loose thread over these various tastings that 2003 produced successful wines in the Rhone which are developing in a satisfying manner. A new thread on the dissatisfaction of the 2007 vintage has appeared.
For current drinking, I recommend the three oldest vintages of Vieilles Vignes. Of this trio I preferred the 2003 followed by the 2005 and 1999. The 2010s and 2012s are very good in general but it is the 2012 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes I would lay down for the future. Not only does it smell great but it has the essential components of fruit, garrigue, and minerals. If you cannot find that vintage the 2010 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes is right on its heels. And if you cannot find that vintage then the 2015 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes is probably a safe bet. I think it has great potential so check on it in 2-3 years.
While I have recommended the Vieilles Vignes wines in specific, the quality of all of the wines we tasted (except the 2007) was very high across the board. It is one of the most satisfying tastings I have attended in recent memory.
1999 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes
Medium garnet in color. Moderate mature aromas with more smoke than the 2003. In the mouth, this mature wine offers up leather, minerals, and structure. The wine is in good shape, showing more focus and structure. There is a sense of levity that matches the flavors which bear moderate ripe weight. Overall, an elegant wine of sweet, ripe fruit, wood block, leather, and structure. **** Now – 2025.
2003 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes
Medium garnet. A touch of earthy cheese on the nose. Flavorful and rounder with noticeably more fruit. Clearly a riper vintage than the 1999 but still shows a similar level of maturity. The fruit comes through at the end where it grips the mouth. Tasty. **** Now – 2023.
2005 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes
The younger color is matched by the youngest flavors of the first three wines. In the mouth it is dense with young blue fruit. It packs more in including an eventual mature note. It comes across as in mid-life. It is great now with weight and though a bit intense, I wonder how long it will last. **** Now – 2023.
2007 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Chaupin
Almost spritzy to start with blue fruit, plums, and lower acidity. Upon revisiting, clearly the weakest of all the wines tasted. What’s going on here? * Drink up.
2009 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Chaupin
More berries on the nose and young in the mouth. There are berry flavors in the round start with ripe tannins and some fat soon coming out. It is a little tense with waves of mouthfilling ripe, spiced fruit and licorice. It has concentration for age. ***(*) Now – 2028.
2010 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Chaupin
A hint of meat on the nose. Coming into mid-life with pure blue fruit, it has all of the components for further development. Dense, though with less oomp than the 2009, it is a balanced, elegant wine with lovely, round sweet, weighted flavors. **** Now – 2025.
2010 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes
A young ruby, black cherry color. A nose of berries and grapes. In the mouth it is rather youthful with ripe spices, fruit, and ripe tannins. In the first third of its life, it is lovely to revisit for the clear berry flavor. ****(*) Now – 2028.
2012 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape
An interesting nose of tobacco and red, berry fruit. Light and linear in the mouth, watering acidity and ripe tannins move into the drier finish. There is structure in the finish and the sense of dryness remains. *** Now – 2023.
2012 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Chaupin
An interesting nose of elegant red fruit. Excellent, with cooler flavors, fresh and floral. The redder fruit is pretty, balanced by grip and structure. It becomes younger with air. **** Now – 2030.
2012 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes
A lovely nose. This wine packs it in with watering acidity, mineral, garrigue, and more black fruit. Youthful. ****(*) Now – 2033.
2015 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape Vieilles Vignes
Grenache on the nose. In the mouth, this is young, ripe, and tense. Fresh acidity carries the primary and grapey flavors which are balanced. This has great potential, the weight of the black fruit and dry baking spices will carry it for some time. ***(**) 2021-2031.
2016 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape
Sweet, ripe fruit is cool and elegant. It oscillates in nature, clearly still primary. A lovely wine with power but it is not overdone. ***(*) 2021-2028.
1985 and 1988 Brunello di Montalcino tasting
This past month I hosted a Brunello di Montalcino tasting focused on the great 1985 and 1988 vintages from five producers. Though these vintages are only three years apart, they are at significantly different stages of life. The 1988s are generally less evolved on the nose, with a core of fruit in the mouth and significant tannic structure. The 1985s are more aromatic, mature, and softer in edge. Such were the qualities of the fruit from the 1988s and the aroma of the 1985s that several guests blended their Ciacci’s to strong success. I even joined in on the fun and rated my blend a check plus!
As for the unblended wines our pair of Biondi-Santi were outliers. The 1988 was a bad bottle and the 1985 was uninspiring. The other eight bottles spanned a range of drinking states and qualities. The 1988 Livio Sassetti, Pertimali, Brunello di Montalcino Riserva and 1985 Livio Sassetti, Pertimali, Brunello di Montalcino Riserva are my favorites from this evening. Both vintages bear aromas that I love with the 1985 drinking at a sweet spot. After several hours the 1985 La Chiesa di Santa Restituta, Brunello di Montalcino began to open up, revealing an inky core of fruit, both elegant and tense. A determined wine that will continue to develop. The 1988 La Chiesa di Santa Restituta, Brunello di Montalcino is even less evolved but worth following. The 1988 Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona, Brunello di Montalcino, Pianrosso is quite good too, showing floral notes on the nose and in the mouth. The 1985 Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona, Brunello di Montalcino takes on perfume as well. Though others surely disagree, I found the 1988 Poggio Antico, Brunello di Montalcino Riserva too young and clean for my liking and the 1985 Poggio Antico, Brunello di Montalcino too soft.
At 30+ years of age Brunello di Montalcino can remain clearly structured, tough to drink, and barely evolved in flavor. Yet our best bottles are expressive, complex, and will drink in such a fine state for many years to come.
Please find my tasting notes below. All of the wines were double-decanted one hour prior to tasting then followed over several hours. I must once again thank Mannie Berk, The Rare Wine Co., for opening up his inventory to me.
1988 Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona, Brunello di Montalcino, Pianrosso
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Alcohol 14%. A finely articulated nose of mixed florals, incense, and wet wood. In the mouth it is finely veined with a core of deep fruit supported by strong and drying tannins. With air the wine remains tight with its floral, fruit vein. **** Now – 2028.
1985 Ciacci Piccolomini d’Aragona, Brunello di Montalcino
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Alcohol 13%. Quite aromatic. A softer edge though there is power from the strong and drying tannins. There mature flavors with a soft edge becoming black fruited and perfumed in the nose. ***(*) Now – 2028.
1988 Livio Sassetti, Pertimali, Brunello di Montalcino Riserva
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Alcohol 13.5%. Good nose. In the mouth is fine grained flavor, focused around a core of red and black fruit. The profile is a little tart and certainly drying from the tannins. With air remains great focus and balance with complexity from Christmas baking spices and the inky finish. **** Now – 2033.
1985 Livio Sassetti, Pertimali, Brunello di Montalcino Riserva
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Alcohol 13.5%. A love nose that is meaty, bloody, wild and evocative of wood box. This remained the most aromatically interesting wine from the first pour to the end of the evening. In the mouth, tart red fruit mixes with citric tannins providing engaging grip. Mature flavors from bottle age, earth, and wood box effectively mix together. “Sauvage” as one guest commented. A lovely wine of medium body which expands in the mouth leaving very fine, drying tannins on the gums in the end. ****(*) Now – 2028.
1988 Poggio Antico, Brunello di Montalcino Riserva
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Alcohol 13%. The deeper aromas are closely played but reveal berries and are of more interest than the 1985 sibling. It is a slowly evolving wine with cherry, watering acidity, and a vein of structure. Still young, not yet in mid-age with clean and elegant fruit. *** Now – 2023-2033.
1985 Poggio Antico, Brunello di Montalcino
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Alcohol 13%. Sour, clean fruit with watering acidity, and an incensed finish. There is a rounder start with more body and citric tannins on the sides of the gums. However, the flavors do not have the life giving energy. ** Now.
1988 La Chiesa di Santa Restituta, Brunello di Montalcino
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Alcohol 13.5%. Some roast on the nose, balsamic. A core of sweet fruit develops and a pure, forward note of oregano. Needs time. **(**) 2023-2033.
1985 La Chiesa di Santa Restituta, Brunello di Montalcino
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Alcohol 13.5%. A fine nose develops after a few hours. With maturing fruit, and some sorry cherry this wine continued to evolve over the evening. The acidity creates tension between the inky, fine core of fruit, and supportive component. Red and black fruit mix convincingly, sporting elegant weight as textured tannins are left on the gums. ***(**) 2020-2035.
1988 Il Greppo, Biondi-Santi, Brunello di Montalcino
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. A bad bottle! Not Rated.
1985 Il Greppo, Biondi-Santi, Brunello di Montalcino
Imported by The Rare Wine Co. Scented on the nose but a bit thin in flavor. Perhaps elegant, I only note tartness and acidity with an eventual leather note. ** Now.
Rhone Research – 2016 Chateauneuf du Pape, Part 1
By all accounts, the 2016 vintage is stellar in the Southern Rhone. It is hype that the group, gathered by Phil Bernstein, of MacArthur Beverages, were no doubt aware of. Together, we tasted through nine bottles of recently arrived 2016 Chateauneuf du Pape focusing in on some big names and top cuvees. The reputation bore out in our limited experience.
These bottles of 2016 Chateauneuf du Pape are dense, highly flavorful wines with ample fruit and fresh acidity, that can be subtly or not so subtly intense. In this vein, the vintage character is evident in everything we tasted. At an individual level, some wines will come to sooner, like the Clos de Papes and the regular Domaine de la Janasse. The former was the only bottle finished off but the latter is nearly as good right now and certainly a best buy. In fact, I prefer this cuvee over the Chaupin and Vieilles Vignes! Of course time may prove me wrong.
The Le Vieux Donjon should not be overlooked for cellaring. It sports the lowest alcohol level of the group which lends itself to the floral elegance of the fruit. I particularly liked the Domaine de Marcoux, revealing complex red berries but also like its Vieilles Vignes sibling, it contains the most structure of the lot. The Marcoux wines might take the longest to come around and be the longest to live, but they should reward handsomely. The Vieilles Vignes packs more in yet has levity despite its 16% alcohol level. It is inky, sappy, and best enjoyed in small sips at this youthful age.
The wines were all double-decanted one hour prior to the taste then served blind in paper bags. Please find my notes below, in the order of the tasting, which includes the two Champagne as well. I should note, that nothing is marked by *****. The best wines will develop and improve further, so I had to leave wiggle room for improvement!
NV Veuve Fourny & Fils, Champagne Rose Brut
Imported by Kermit Lynch. Alcohol 12.6%. A pale cooper rose color. Chalk greets with the good mousse. Eventually a yeasty, cola hint then dry from the middle. Good flavor and robust personality. *** Now.
1 – 2016 Clos de Papes, Chateauneuf du Pape – $109
Imported by MacArthur Liquors. This wine is a blend of 60% Grenache, 30% Mourvedre, and 10% Syrah aged in old foudre. Grapey with some Christmas spice on the nose. In the mouth, smooth, beautiful, supple and fresh through the finish. There are hints of heat as the very fine, dry structure comes out. There is good focus to the grapey, bright fruit with a hint of nuts in the end. ****(*) Now – 2033.
2 – 2016 Roger Sabon, Prestige, Chateauneuf du Pape – $75
Imported by European Cellars. This wine is a blend of 70% Grenache, 20% Syrah, 5% Mourvedre, and 5% other varieties. Alcohol 15%. Fresh on the nose with a greenhouse aspect, more modern. Dense, thick, and savory with a mineral middle. With air the wine remains thick but with cool acidity and attractive fat in the aftertaste. Much better than the Reserve. **** Now – 2030.
3 – 2016 Roger Sabon, Reserve, Chateauneuf du Pape – $50
Imported by European Cellars. This wine is a blend of 80% Grenache, 10% Mourvedre, and 10% Syrah aged in foudres and vats. Alcohol 15%. Subtle but a touch more floral. Fresh and redder with watering acidity. It remains a brighter wine that is tightly focused around a finely woven wood vein. With air too much heat for my preference. *** 2021- 3035.
4 – 2016 Domaine de la Janasse, Vieilles Vignes, Chateauneuf du Pape – $109
Imported by European Cellars. This wine is a blend of 75% Grenache, 12% Mourvedre, 8% Syrah, and the rest other permitted varieties. Alcohol 15%. Raisinated, intense, with heat early on and powerful structure with black stones in the finish. With air the wine remains dense and packed through the stone and mineral finish. Weakest of this flight of three. It improves with air, but is completely shut down. ***(**) 2023 – 2038.
5 – 2016 Domaine de la Janasse, Chateauneuf du Pape – $50
Imported by MacArthur Liquors. Alcohol 15%. Rounded, supple with better balance, and an old-school flavor aspect. There is fat that covers the concentrated red fruit into the beautiful mineral end. With air the wine remains pure in fruit, clean, with powdery texture. Ripe tannins build and expand in the end. This should be in every CdP lovers cellar….a stellar buy. ****(*) Now – 2028.
6 – 2016 Domaine de Marcoux, Chateauneuf du Pape – $65
Imported by MacArthur Liquors. Alcohol 15.5%. More robust in flavor with red and blue fruit carried by fresh acidity. It becomes brighter in the finish where ripe tannins coat the gums. The most tannic of the trio but it is opening up with air to reveal a good balance of flavor in the form of ripe berries, strawberry, and raspberry. It eventually exposes complexity that persists through the finish. There is even a piñon hint. This should be in your cellar too! ****(*) Now – 2043.
7 – 2016 Domaine de Marcoux, Vieilles Vignes, Chateauneuf du Pape – $159
Imported by MacArthur Liquors. Alcohol 16%. Backwards on the nose. In the mouth, it is dense with good acidity and more structure than the previous wine. The flavors are elegant, grapey purple, perhaps a bit lighter but there is better balance overall. The acidity matches the medium to full weight, maintaining levity. In the end the wine is sappy with inky, cranberry red flavors. For the long-haul. ****(*) Now – 2048.
8 – 2016 Le Vieux Donjon, Chateauneuf du Pape – $ 60
Imported by MacArthur Liquors. Alcohol 14.5%. Pepper scented on the nose. It is dense, savory, and salty, certainly packing in the flavor. The fruit, though, is floral and finely delineated leading the way to a nearly lifted middle. With air the definite structure is revealed so best drunk after several more years. A strong showing. ****(*) Now – 2038.
9 – 2016 Domaine de la Janasse, Chaupin, Chateauneuf du Pape – $75
Imported by MacArthur Liquors. This wine is 100% Grenache sourced from vines reaching up to 100+ years of age on sandy soils. Alcohol 15%. Dense as well but silky with finely grained flavor and texture from the very fine, dry tannins. Red berries and firm minerals…actually very minerally, with a touch of heat in the end. Overall, hot and hard to drink, it never came round. *** 2023 – 2033.
NV Christophe Mignon, Pur Meunier, Champagne Brut Nature
Polaner Selection. This wine is 100% Petit Muenier. Alcohol 12.5%. A scented nose of orchards and polished wood. A lovely nose. Finely textured bubbles followed by deep flavor of chalk and sour apple. The mousse and flavor mix very well. ***(*) Now – 2023.