A dinner party with old wine
This past weekend Lou and I went to a fun dinner party where we ate heaps of meat and drank some old wine. Lou’s friend Todd spearheaded the food side of things and Lisa offered up her place. This meant that Lou and I selected the wines. We started with a very fresh tasting 2008 Drouhin-Vaudon, Chablis Premier Cru. It showed younger than I expected with the bottle age taking off any rough corners and adding a hint of orchard fruit.
Once everyone arrived and set about tucking into the cheese and charcuterie, we cracked open the NV Michel Turgy, Reserve Selection, Champagne Brut Blanc de Blancs and the NV Vilmart & Cie, Grand Cellier, Champagne Brut Premier Cru. The Turgy is a pure Chardonnay based Champagne that was vinified entirely in stainless steel. The Vilmart is a blend of mostly Chardonnay with Pinot Noir that was both fermented and aged in oak. This made for an enjoyably different pair of wines, with the Turgy very aromatic with mature aromas and more explosive bubbles. The Vilmart had a subdued nose but was top-notch in the mouth with a luxurious mousse and all around harmony. I highly recommend you seek out both of these.
With our palete wet we moved on to a trio of Pinot Noir. I have written about the 2001 Domaine Serene, Pinot Noir, Evenstad Reserve, Willamette Valley and 2003 Brick House, Pinot Noir, Cuvée du Tonnelier, Willamette Valley before so I shall pass over those. The third bottle, in the form of the 1985 Comte Armand, Pommard Clos de Epenaux, showed an attractive maturity with plenty of earthy aromas that pervaded through the mouth. We have drunk one bottle before that seemed very young, this bottle was very expressive with good strength.
With the bottles of Pinot Noir drained we moved on to a pair of Bordeaux. Perhaps the 1982 Château Prieurié Lichine, Margaux was destined to be a mere solid experience due to the heat stress in Margaux or the estate itself. It was, nevertheless, a decent wine that only helped elevate the excellent bottle of 1982 Château Meyney, Saint-Estèphe. The Meyney proved quite aromatic with satisfying presence in the mouth. It was both mature and youthful at the same time making for a fine glass.
For the 1978 vintage we opened a pair from Saint-Julien. I had high hopes for the 1978 Château Ducru-Beaucaillou, Saint-Julien but this particular bottle offered darker red fruit, that while good, did not have quite the vigor it should have. The 1978 Château Gruaud-Larose, Saint-Julien on the other hand was completely open with its aromatic nose, expansive flavors, and strength. You could generally say the 1982s were fruitier and the 1978s were more rugged. More importantly, though, all four bottles provoked delight and were drained of their very last drops.
To transition to the Sauternes course we selected the 1977 Ridge Late Harvest Zinfandel Trentadue Ranch, Sonoma County due to the bit of residual sugar at bottling. From a drought vintage in California, I was prepared for it to be sherried at this age. It wasn’t! In fact it was like a solid, rustic old Californian wine. Be it the high alcohol level or its age, it drank more like the previous wines than a dessert wine. Lou is a firm believer in old Ridge wines and this bottle demonstrates why. I wish I could write more about the wine but I only had a tiny pour as I was quick to check on the Sauternes.
Both of our bottles of Sauterne were from good vintages. I expected the 1983 Château Bastor-Lamontagne, Sauternes to be more advanced given the color and simpler given the reputation. My expectations were met for there was a burst of mouthfilling, dark, botrytised fruit followed by a simpler and shorter finish. The sweetness was more obvious too. Quickly down the hatch it went! With everyone adjusted we poured the 1988 Château de Rayne Vigneau, Sauternes. This is an important vintage for the vineyard had been replanted, the rebuilding of the chais was complete with new stainless steel tanks, new barriques, and a cold chamber first employed for the 1987 vintage. Fortunately, the cold chamber was not required for the 1988 vintage which was the first to experience the pneumatic press. All of these updates showed through the wine. It was beautiful, more on the elegant side but it sported a finely articulate nose with perfectly balanced fruit, acidity, and sweetness in the mouth. As Lou commented, it is ready for a long future of development.
Many thanks to Todd, Lisa, and everyone else for such a fun evening!